Відео

Interesting. I can speak to the Bible: Christians need to submit to the text, and sometimes the text tells us we are wrong. Sometimes a Christian or a group make a misinterpretation or similar out of ignorance/innocence. But some do it intentionally, to mislead others, this is of course a serious sin. Not least of all because the Bible says so at Deuteronomy 12:32, but for other reasons as well.

your guest need to learn arabic first 😂😂

Islam is a self made man sect...

At 23.30 Dr Reynolds posed the question to Prof Stephen Shoemaker: Who wrote the Quran? Was it Uthman or was it Abdul Malek? 23:30

Hi Dr Reynolds. There is a commentary The Hadith that you mentioned in the books of Shia Hadith. For example Sadiq narrates in his book "Al-Tawheed" from Ali Ibn Musa Al-Rezaعلیه السلام ( A descendant of The prophet Muhammad صلی الله علیه و آله The 8th Imam of Shias and Also a very respected figure by Sunnis,I'm sure you know about him) that this Hadith is taken out of context. The context being that one day The Prophet Muhammad (صلی الله علیه و آله) witnessed Two men fighting with each other and one said to the other :"قبح الله وجهک”( "May Allah make your face ugly" if I am translating correctly) And the prophet told him :" Do not say that to him for Allah created Adam in his image"(his referring to the man being insulted) meaning that the Man's face was similar to Adam علیه السلام and the prophet forbid the man from insulting his face. I would like to know your thoughts on this This us the link to the Hadith in Bihar Al Anwar shiaonlinelibrary.com/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A8/1435_%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A-%D8%AC-%D9%A4/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%AD%D8%A9_13

Zayd was a slave but kind treatment of Muhammad to him made him a fan. when father and uncle of Zayd came to Makkah to pay money to purchase his freedom, Muhammad refused to accept any money and announced that Zayd is free and if he wishes, he could go to his family. But Zayd preferred to stay with Muhammad rather going to his father and mother. Muhammad announced him as adopted son. People then called Zayd as son of Muhammad. it was a Pre Islamuc custom according to cultural norms of pagan society in Arabia. But Quran changed the custom and declared that adopted children are not real children and should be called after name of their real father. So people then called Zayd as son of Harith (his own father). This event fixed an important rule in Islamic legislation and jurispudence. Secondly Zainab was Muhammad's cousin. He knew her very well since her childhood. She was not an alien for him. Accusation of Muhammad being fascinated by Zainab's beauty is only a false charge by Christian missionries and orientalists. if it was real, would be definitely mentioned by women of that siciety but never a single mention in any tradition from that time. Muhammad himself got her married to Zayd to fulfil another rule of Islamic legislation. In Islam, free man can marry a slave woman and a free woman can marry a slave man. Although it was against cultural norms of that time, Muhammad himself married slave women to set an examole for Muslims. He offered marriage of Zainab (her cousin and belonging to noblest clan in Makkah) to a freed slave to abolish the pagan custom of dscrimination between slave and free man. But due to some reason, it was not a happy marriage and despite Prophet's advice, Zayd divorced her. Zainab who agreed for this marriage on advice of Muhammad, was now deeply grieved on break up. the most suitable compensation was that Muhammad married himself to her. it raised her social status, becoming wife of the Prophet and chief of Muslim state. She remained very happy in her life and boasted in front of other wives that she was given in marriage to the Prophet by God.

Oh that's interesting surahs might come from other cities or they might come from Mecca and Medina. Very profound.

If the prophet receives in a chronological and his followers memorize in such, who decides to messed up his message. Human beings. If human beings are the ones put it together, we have a problem.

If it was Shahih good grade hadith he would have pointed it out.

Wanna know the truth about Islam? Find Christian Prince right here on UA-cam.Youre welcome.

Quran is a forgery of the Aramaic speaking Christian tribes living in Arabia which became Heterodoxy after the council of Chalcedon. Thank me later.

the arabic language is laughing in the corner

Cool

"Wayl" is has an arabic root. Its an Arabic word

Those attributes are not physical. Arabic language has a lot of metaphorical weight. Our classical scholarship tells us that assigning body parts to God is blasphemy. Don't misrepresent Islam

your not a real muslim in the eyes of islam.. your simple a by product of western muslim infidelity .. the truth muslim is grounded in the root of arabic culture

I don’t know the answers to the issues he bring up, but I do know that Islam is a death cult

Oh my goodness you are so uneducated in Arabic language Please study You are illiterate

A lot to discuss here. When I have some time and energy I will try to address your points. As a native Arabic speaker that I can explain where you got it wrong. Also, the hadith refers to the first face of the man in question and the image was of Adam's.

Allegories. Look up the description of Allah SWT by Imam Ali AS.

No...

Imagine this: A french coloniser, in africa, showing a picture of white jesus with long hair, and claiming all white people are gods to all black people. And demanding 100% taxes before he trows em in hell

2 right hands

The Quran is a perversion

If God is completely unlike creation, then how are we to understand all these verses that imply similarity between God and created things. What does it mean for God to have two right hands, fingers, a foot, a shin etc. These are not anatomical features akin to human body parts, but to the extent we use the same words to describe these features there must be some basic similarity between God and creatures. And then you have hadiths which explicitly state that men were created in the image of God. Despite all of this, how can God be "totally unlike" creation? I really don't understand the doctrine of Tanzih.

Perhaps Maccabees ? Not my idea, but from another scholar

Idt the prophet really became lustful at the sight of a lightly clothed Zaynab. That seems quite unlikely.

adam is made in his image and he does have hands if u are aware of aqidah

'breath soul/ life into' even me as a 7 year old knew this was a metaphor- like when i didnt even know what a metaphor is. i subscribed this channel thinking it was a more scholastic look into the quran from a nonmuslim perspective. this is indeed a horible and desperate attempt at forcing in faults when u cant find any.

Face

I'm from Indonesia and I really like your videos, because they increase my knowledge, convey my greetings to Munim Sirry

It’s metaphorical

For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (they do agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) - 1) The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his children (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course thats impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49), Jesus was of course the son of David, the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, begetting, and birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mothers womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called son of God for that reason (Luke 3:38). The author of 1st John strictly warns that whoever refuses to confess Jesus as the son of God has proven God is not with him (1st John 4:15). The Quran, however, denies Jesus is the son of God and even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God. 2) The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to immortal life and incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that its necessary to believe this happened to please and obey God faithfully. The Quran teaches he only appeared to die. 3) The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries (world peace - Isaiah 2:4, world knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14, ressurection of the dead - Daniel 12:2, immortal life - Daniel 12:2, freedom of Israel and Gods people, possesion of the earth by Gods people, royal authority given to Gods people over the earth, Gods presence on the earth, etc, all through the Messiah). *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power too! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3). The Quran, as far as I know, has *no clue* about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it. 4) The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching non-violence as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him, most assuredly non-lethal violence. His followers were to "love your enemies" and "do not repay evil with evil". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and be spared it. The Quran allows for or possibly even demands violence, even lethal violence, even on a judicial level. 5) The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws of the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages. ------------------------------- - These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of whats going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things. Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate. Thank you for reading, whoever read this this far.

For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (they do agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) - 1) The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his children (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course thats impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49), Jesus was of course the son of David, the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, begetting, and birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mothers womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called son of God for that reason (Luke 3:38). The author of 1st John strictly warns that whoever refuses to confess Jesus as the son of God has proven God is not with him (1st John 4:15). The Quran, however, denies Jesus is the son of God and even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God. 2) The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to immortal life and incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that its necessary to believe this happened to please and obey God faithfully. The Quran teaches he only appeared to die. 3) The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries (world peace - Isaiah 2:4, world knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14, ressurection of the dead - Daniel 12:2, immortal life - Daniel 12:2, freedom of Israel and Gods people, possesion of the earth by Gods people, royal authority given to Gods people over the earth, Gods presence on the earth, etc, all through the Messiah). *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power too! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3). The Quran, as far as I know, has *no clue* about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it. 4) The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching non-violence as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him, most assuredly non-lethal violence. His followers were to "love your enemies" and "do not repay evil with evil". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and be spared it. The Quran allows for or possibly even demands violence, even lethal violence, even on a judicial level. 5) The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws of the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages. ------------------------------- - These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of whats going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things. Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate. Thank you for reading, whoever read this this far.

For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (they do agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) - 1) The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his children (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course thats impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49), Jesus was of course the son of David, the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, begetting, and birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mothers womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called son of God for that reason (Luke 3:38). The author of 1st John strictly warns that whoever refuses to confess Jesus as the son of God has proven God is not with him (1st John 4:15). The Quran, however, denies Jesus is the son of God and even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God. 2) The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to immortal life and incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that its necessary to believe this happened to please and obey God faithfully. The Quran teaches he only appeared to die. 3) The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" or "submit", it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries (world peace - Isaiah 2:4, world knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14, ressurection of the dead - Daniel 12:2, immortal life - Daniel 12:2, freedom of Israel and Gods people, possesion of the earth by Gods people, royal authority given to Gods people over the earth, Gods presence on the earth, etc, all through the Messiah). *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power too! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3). The Quran, as far as I know, has *no clue* about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it. 4) The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching non-violence as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him, most assuredly non-lethal violence. His followers were to "love your enemies" and "do not repay evil with evil". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and be spared it. The Quran allows for or possibly even demands violence, even lethal violence, even on a judicial level. 5) The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws of the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages. ------------------------------- - These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of whats going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things. Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate. Thank you for reading, whoever read this this far.

For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (they do agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) - 1) The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his children (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course thats impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49), Jesus was of course the son of David, the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, begetting, and birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mothers womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called son of God for that reason (Luke 3:38). The author of 1st John strictly warns that whoever refuses to confess Jesus as the son of God has proven God is not with him (1st John 4:15). The Quran, however, denies Jesus is the son of God and even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God. 2) The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to immortal life and incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that its necessary to believe this happened to please and obey God faithfully. The Quran teaches he only appeared to die. 3) The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries (world peace - Isaiah 2:4, world knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14, ressurection of the dead - Daniel 12:2, immortal life - Daniel 12:2, freedom of Israel and Gods people, possesion of the earth by Gods people, royal authority given to Gods people over the earth, Gods presence on the earth, etc, all through the Messiah). *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power too! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3). The Quran, as far as I know, has *no clue* about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it. 4) The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching non-violence as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him, most assuredly non-lethal violence. His followers were to "love your enemies" and "do not repay evil with evil". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and be spared it. The Quran allows for or possibly even demands violence, even lethal violence, even on a judicial level. 5) The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws of the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages. ------------------------------- - These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of whats going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things. Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate. Thank you for reading, whoever read this this far.

For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (they do agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) - 1) The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his children (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course thats impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49), Jesus was of course the son of David, the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, begetting, and birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mothers womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called son of God for that reason (Luke 3:38). The author of 1st John strictly warns that whoever refuses to confess Jesus as the son of God has proven God is not with him (1st John 4:15). The Quran, however, denies Jesus is the son of God and even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God. 2) The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to immortal life and incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that its necessary to believe this happened to please and obey God faithfully. The Quran teaches he only appeared to die. 3) The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries (world peace - Isaiah 2:4, world knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14, ressurection of the dead - Daniel 12:2, immortal life - Daniel 12:2, freedom of Israel and Gods people, possesion of the earth by Gods people, royal authority given to Gods people over the earth, Gods presence on the earth, etc, all through the Messiah). *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power too! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3). The Quran, as far as I know, has *no clue* about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it. 4) The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching non-violence as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him, most assuredly non-lethal violence. His followers were to "love your enemies" and "do not repay evil with evil". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and be spared it. The Quran allows for or possibly even demands violence, even lethal violence, even on a judicial level. 5) The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws of the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages. ------------------------------- - These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of whats going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things. Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate. Thank you for reading, whoever read this this far.

For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (before you read, please note, they both agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) - 1) - The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his "children" (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course that's impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49). Jesus was of course the "son of David", the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, a unique begetting, and one-of-a-kind birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mother Mary's womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called "son of God" for that reason (Luke 3:38). For us Christians, the author of one of our holy books "1st John" tells us to listen to those who confess Jesus as the son of God and that the one who confesses this has God with him (1st John 4:15). - The Quran seems to deny that Jesus is the son of God or even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God. 2) - The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to life, but now immortal life along with new incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that it's necessary to believe this happened to both please and obey God faithfully. - From what I am told, the Quran teaches he only appeared to die. 3) - The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" or to simply "submit to God", instead it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries. - Promises of world peace - Isaiah 2:4, - World-Wide knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14, - Resurrection of the Dead - Daniel 12:2, - Immortal life and re-access to the tree of life in Eden- Daniel 12:2 Revelation 2:7, - Freedom of Israel and Gods people - Isaiah 54, Acts 1:6-7 - Possession of the Earth by Gods people - Daniel 7:13-18 Matthew 5:5, - Royal authority given to God's people over the earth and the Nations - Daniel 7:18 Isaiah 45:14 Isaiah 60:14 Revelation 3:21 Matthew 19:28 1st Corinthians 6:2-3, - Gods restored Eden-like presence on the earth - Revelation 21:3;22, All accomplished through the mighty empowered Messiah-King of God. *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power to! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven playing a harp, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3). - The Quran, as far as I have been told, doesn't teach about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it. 4) - The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching steadfast enduring non-violence while preaching this message as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him. Most assuredly lethal violence was forbidden. His followers were to "love their enemies" and to "not repay evil with evil" to not "[violently] resist the evil-doer". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and so be spared the vengeance. - The Quran allows for or possibly even demands violence, even lethal violence, even on a judicial level. 5) - The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws concerning the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns or commands of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance regarding clean and unclean, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. Only obeying or disobeying the commands of his holy Messiah will affect whether he accepts or rejects you from the coming Kingdom and life. - The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages. ------------------------------- - These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of what's going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things. Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate. Thank you for reading, whoever read this far.

Our church liturgy is Syriac but our language we speak at home is Assyrian

Biased, is that right? So why are there Hadiths where the companions of the Prophet get punished, corrected ect ? And why does Allah mention in the Qoran that the Prophet forgot to say In sha Allah? And a few more incidents actually where the Prophet corrected by Allah the most High. So im sorry guys, but this is just fals information from a western scholar....

Should not punch another man in his face? Clearly doesn't apply to non-believers

1. It was through Gabriel the angel not Allah himself that breathed into her vagina 2. Allah says “We” in the verse is he talking about multiple persons? I thought Muslims believed in mono-theism Allah is one? “We blew into [her] through our angel. 3. I don’t get you as you seem to defend this nonsense in the Quran? People are being led astray following the cult and you’re talking like that doesn’t matter. What’s your end game? Don’t you want people to come to Jesus?

Two right hands, he blew into Mary's farg.

For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (they do agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) - 1) The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his children (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course thats impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49), Jesus was of course the son of David, the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, begetting, and birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mothers womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called son of God for that reason (Luke 3:38). The author of 1st John strictly warns that whoever refuses to confess Jesus as the son of God has proven God is not with him (1st John 4:15). The Quran, however, denies Jesus is the son of God and even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God. 2) The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to immortal life and incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that its necessary to believe this happened to please and obey God faithfully. The Quran teaches he only appeared to die. 3) The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries (world peace - Isaiah 2:4, world knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14, ressurection of the dead - Daniel 12:2, immortal life - Daniel 12:2, freedom of Israel and Gods people, possesion of the earth by Gods people, royal authority given to Gods people over the earth, Gods presence on the earth, etc, all through the Messiah). *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power too! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3). The Quran, as far as I know, has *no clue* about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it. 4) The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching non-violence as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him, most assuredly non-lethal violence. His followers were to "love your enemies" and "do not repay evil with evil". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and be spared it. The Quran allows for or possibly even demands violence, even lethal violence, even on a judicial level. 5) The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws of the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages. ------------------------------- - These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of whats going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things. Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate. Thank you for reading, whoever read this this far.

10 - حَدَّثَنا أَبُو العَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِبْراهيمِ بْنِ إِسْحاقالطَّالِقانِيُّ رَضِىَ اللهُ عَنْهُ قالَ: حَدَّثَنا أَحْمَدِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ سَعِيدُ الكُوفِيّ قالَ: حَدَّثَنا عَلِىِّ بْنِ الحَسَنِ بْنِ عَلِىِّ بْنِ فضال، عَنْ أَبيهِ قالَ: قُلْتُ لِلرِّضَا عَلَيْهِ السَّلامُ لِمَ سُمِّيَ الْحَوَارِيُّونَ الْحَوَارِيِّينَ قَالَ أَمَّا عِنْدَ النَّاسِ فَإِنَّهُمْ سُمُّوْا حَوَارِيِّينَ لانَّهُمْ كَانُوا قَصَّارِينَ يُخَلِّصُونَ الثِّيَابَ مِنَ الْوَسَخِ بِالْغَسْلِ وَهُوَاسْمٌ مُشْتَقٌّ مِنَ الْخُبْزِ الْحُوَّارَى وَأَمَّا عِنْدَنَا فَسُمِّيَ الْحَوَارِيُّونَ حَوَارِيِّينَ لانَّهُمْ كَانُوا مُخْلَصِينَ فِي أَنْفُسِهِمْ وَمُخْلِصِينَ لِغَيْرِهِمْ مِنْ أَوْسَاخِ الذُّنُوبِ بِالْوَعْظِ وَالتَّذْكِيرِ قَالَ فَقُلْتُ لَهُ فَلِمَ سُمِّيَ النَّصَارَى نَصَارَى قَالَ لانَّهُمْ مِنْ قَرْيَةٍ اسْمُهَا نَاصِرَةُ مِنْ بِلادِ الشَّامِ نَزَلَتْهَا مَرْيَمُ وَعِيسَى‏ عَلَيْهِ السَّلامُ بَعْدَ رُجُوعِهِمَا مِنْ مِصْرَ. 32-10 Abul Abbas Muhammad ibn Ibrahim ibn Ishaq al-Taleqani - may God be pleased with him - narrated that Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Sa’eed al-Kufi quoted on the authority of Ali ibn Al-Hassan ibn Ali ibn Fadhdhal, on the authority of his father, ‘I asked Abil Hassan Ar-Ridha’ (a.s.): Why were the disciples (of Jesus) called the Hawariyoon? He (a.s.) said, ‘They were called the Hawariyoon by the people since they used to wash clothes. They cleansed the filth and dirt from clothes. Another reason is that the word Hawariyoon is derived from the word Hawar (bread) that is a form of bread made with sieved flour. We call them this because they cleansed themselves and others by means of the advice they gave.’... ʿUyun akhbar al-Rida - Volume 2, Content, On Ar-Ridha’s Words on the Reasons for Various Things, Hadith #101 Shared from the Thaqalayn Library App

Keep up the good work telling facts my friend, - from an ex-muslim.

I wpuld love see historical schlorship of hinduism, like its been quite studied more than islam as indology has been the most studied subject among the historical scholaeship after western history from the colonial times starting from sir william jones but on youtube we dont have a credible source for the origins and scholarship of Gita etc.

The Tamtheel/ Tashbeeh (Negation of Anthropomorphism) means likening the attributes of Allah to that of humans is Prohibited .Ironically and interestinglyQuran & hadiths affirm Allah has a visible form & moves from place to place.Here are a few quranic passages & Hadiths to peruse.I cite the verses & hadith numbers for the reader to read, sometimes emphasizing the gist of it.Sura 53:1-10 Then he approached him & He came closer.Sura 81:19-25 And without doubt he saw him in the close horizon.Allah has a face sura 55:26-27, Allah has an eye sura 20:36-39,Allah is seated on the throne sura57:4, to say that mounting the throne is Metaphorical indicates Allah assumed Sovereignty over creation leaves more problems as it implies that previous to this point in time he wasn't Sovereign, and if so it means a change in nature of Allah thereby meaning he isn't omniscient, I leave this paradox to the Momineens. The Quran provides proof that the throne is literal with 8 angels holding it Sura69:17. Sahih Bukhari Vol3 Bk 41 Number 595( Moses holding one of the legs of the throne) Allah has a shin Sura 68:42 also in hadith Number 532s Vol9 Bk 93.Allah comes down to the lowest heaven in the third of the night Sahih Bukhari 2:246 Allah has a face Sahih Bukhari 9:503, Allah has a Hand& Fingers Sahih Bukhari9:508, Allah holds the heavens upon a finger Sahih Bukhari 9:511, Allah shakes hands Sunan Ibn Majah English version by Mohd Ansari Vol1 Chapter Number X1, Allah writes Sahih Bukhari 9:501, Allah has a waist Hadith 34 from Al Hadith Al Qudsiyyah By Dr Abdul Kazi.read also this sura 47:22.Allah has a visible form Hadith 43, Hadith 134 Allah will look at the people& the people will look at him, Hadith 113 And when our Lord comes to us we shall recognise him, Allah laughs Sahih Bukhari Vol1 Bk 12 Number 770, Allah created Adam in his image Sahih Bukhari vol8, Bk 74 Number 246, Allah will come to them in a shape other than the one they knowSahih Bukhari Vol 9 Bk 93, Number 532s Seven people will be shaded by his shade when there will be only his shade Sahih Bukhari Vol2 Bk 24 Number504.In a book authored by Sunni Muslim scholar of Islamic Jurisprudence there is an interesting narration that when the most Exalted sits on the Arsh( throne) it squeaks like that of a new leather saddle Vol 1 page 301 Ibn Al Qayyim publishing house.Allah has 2 right hands. and appears to Muhammad as a young man in green garments with curly hair and a beardless face( Amrud) I can provide the references for this if anyone is interested.In view of all these there are 2 conclusions 1) Allah has an actual body. If so this makes Allah an Exalted & glorified man or Allah's body is spiritual not material.If so this implies that Allah cannot be omnipresent, space less, or timeless, hence the dimensions of time, space, & matter become binding upon Allah.This being the case then it ends up in a Greek pagan concept where both God& Matter are eternal! or2) Allah assumes a visible body without this actually being his form.If so then Muslims have no basis to reject the Old Testament theophanies of God & the incarnation of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.If Allah can appear visibly, then the God of the Bible can appear as a man and take on human nature at the Incarnation without Muslims having a Legitimate basis to argue against this fact.In either case Muslims have no VALID Objections against the doctrine of the Trinity & the deity of our Lord& Saviour Jesus Christ.Asharis take it as metaphorical & Salafists take it literally but here's the twist Al Ghazali explained it away with a Seismic invented explanation Bila Kaif wala tashbeeh ( Without How? and Without Likeness) with emphasis on 42:11 "There is Nothing like him" Dr Khalid Andani an Ismaili Shia scholar even says that Sunnis shouldn't mock Christians about the Trinity when they cannot explain Allah's Anthropomorphism. And to those Quran only who say they don't believe the Hadiths, then you violate Sura 33:21& 33:36.To my moslem brethren in humanity Search the TRUTH & it will set you FREE...Ameen.

The disciples were middle eastern , middle easterners are white , its as simple as that

You are shooting yourself in the foot. Hadith was written 200 years later by he say so and she say so. If Quran is the official word of God, God would make as important as being made in the image and likeness of God obvious. It didn't. Don't you see it is fishy?!! As for eliminating the Father talk altogether, Islam once n for all revealed whence this origin is from.